
finish our little tour of Dunkirk, still with OP, with two buildings Jules Potter (1872 -1926). This architect was the nephew of Gabriel Pagnerre, very prolific architect in the Northern Department.
Potter seems to have been specifically attached to the city of Dunkirk, and more particularly to this area very singular Malo-les-Bains, which unquestionably deserves a visit.

On the seafront, which were built many beautiful villas are now extinct, Potier was designed around 1905, the house "Quo Vadis" at No. 75. Its preservation is exceptional today, although we have not quite succeeded in its original condition, both destruction and "renovations" have affected this part of town. If she lost her balcony metal, first floor - replaced by an element glazed with a very poor design, on which the name of the building was stupidly added a second time - she has fortunately able to save most of its enamel steel decor, soft colors and graphics appealing.

The house is mainly for original shapes, round about the second story window, more "Chinese" level. Unfortunately, a raised him to lose at a time already old, its pretty glazed tiles and the bell which had just finished giving an elegant silhouette to any such construction simple.
But we can meet some of these damages of the time: watching old postcard, we will see that the house next door was more severely distorted ...

is reassuring us at No. 25 instead of Turenne, where Jules Potter built a charming little house that we came in much better condition. If the bricks had not used this color indicates that sustained many buildings in northern France, one could easily believe in a street of Nancy. Potter has certainly known by the press of the time, the constructions of Emile Andre, whose windows were sometimes this form of heart shown here on the ground floor. In architecture Nancy, Potier also borrowed gear neo-Gothic, much more rare in the region of Flanders.

The design of the facade is balanced and Art Nouveau elements involved in the solid feel assured that we must recognize it. The only small vanity, charming, one could possibly blame him lies in the two tiny faces that appear in the columns of the first floor balcony. Their style would not be inconsistent with what little we know about the art of Maurice Ringot (see previous story) and we would not be surprised to learn that he collaborated on this project: the sculptors "modern" should not be so numerous that in Dunkirk and Ringot must have had him for most of the market in the field of sculpture "1900".